2/01/2021

Soviet Science Magazines Fantasized About Life in Outer Space


How Soviet Science Magazines Fantasized About Life in Outer Space

The Iron Curtain went to infinity and beyond.

Technology for the Youth, 1969, illustration by R. Avotin, for an article that presents photographs from the Luna 9 space mission. The Moscow Design Museum

A tall stele rises from a deeply cratered surface, casting a long, ominous shadow past a row of smaller towers. Straight lines connect the structures to each other, like streets on a map or the projected moves in a game of cosmic chess. The Earth floats serenely in the dark sky, next to the logo that reads Tekhnika—molodezhi, Russian for Technology for the Youth, a Soviet popular science magazine that launched in 1933. The magazine cover, from 1969, illustrated an article highlighting photographs from Luna 9, the Soviet unmanned spacecraft that was the first to survive a landing on the Moon a few years earlier.

This imagined moonscape is one of more than 250 otherworldly images from the upcoming, visually delightful book, Soviet Space Graphics: Cosmic Visions from the USSR, by Alexandra Sankova, director and founder of the Moscow Design Museum, which collaborated on the book with her. Space Age artwork proliferated alongside the Soviet Union’s popular science magazines—there were up to 200 titles at their peak—during the Cold War. From the mid-1950s to the mid-1970s, in particular, the cosmos became a battleground for world powers jockeying for global dominance. Though the Space Age began with the successful launch of the Soviet Union’s Sputnik 1, it was the United States that, just three years after Luna 9, first put a man on a moonscape like the one on the magazine cover.

Soviet illustrations, even ones with whizzing UFOs and bafflingly futuristic machines, were not drawn to entertain as much as to educate and promote the Communist project. An open letter from cosmonauts to the public in a 1962 issue of Technology for the Youth read “… each of us going to the launch believes deeply that his labor (precisely labor!) makes the Soviet science and the Soviet man even more powerful, and brings closer that wonderful future—the communist future to which all humanity will arrive.” Scientists, astronauts, and aircraft engineers were treated like legends, since outer space was such an important idea in the Soviet Union, according to Sankova. “Achievements of the USSR in the field of space have become a powerful weapon of propaganda,” she says. Soviet citizens lived vicariously through such images, and even the more surreal and fantastical visuals—living in space, meeting new life forms—demonstrated that the idea of cultural revolution need not be limited to Earth.

<em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1972, 'Magic Crystal of the Future,' illustrated by A. Klimov (left); <em>Young Technician</em>, 1964, illustration by R. Avotin (right).
Technology for the Youth, 1972, ‘Magic Crystal of the Future,’ illustrated by A. Klimov (left); Young Technician, 1964, illustration by R. Avotin (right). The Moscow Design Museum

Atlas Obscura spoke with Sankova about alien life, the inspirations of Soviet artists, and how the first man on the Moon changed everything. The book comes out April 1, 2020.

Two directions served as an inspiration for the illustrations: the intensive development of the scientific and technical sphere and the serious enthusiasm of designers and artists for new discoveries in various fields of science as a whole. Artists often had technical education. Another important factor that influenced the visuals was the upsurge of publications, books, novels, and short stories, and the production of science fiction films in the 1920s and the 1950 and 1960s.

Long before the dream of space flight came true, inventors and philosophers were convinced that travel between planets and even universes would become possible with time. In Russia, these ideas became widespread after the works of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky were published. In them, the scientist expressed his view that intelligent life must exist not only on Earth, but throughout the whole universe. Tsiolkovsky became famous not only for his work in engineering, but also for the conviction there must exist highly developed extraterrestrial civilizations capable of influencing the organization of matter and the course of natural processes, and for the aspiration to find a road to the cosmic intelligence and establish an organic connection between man and space.

Soviet writers had expressed the most unbelievable versions of encountering extraterrestrial civilizations. Then, in the 1970s and 1980s, space fantasy faded into the background, giving way to chronicles of the real space exploration program.

<em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1968, illustration by E. Borisov, for an article depicting a future city on the Moon.
Technology for the Youth, 1968, illustration by E. Borisov, for an article depicting a future city on the Moon. The Moscow Design Museum

Where do these illustrations fit in the overall aesthetic of Soviet design?

Soviet graphic design always developed actively and responded to the situation in the country quickly. This was primarily due to the fact that posters, magazines, books, brochures, etc., were the most effective means of propaganda. They were fast and cheap to manufacture, and they presented material in a striking and vivid way, making information visual and generally understood.

Publishing houses throughout the country collaborated with individual artists and workshops that were part of the Union of Artists of the USSR. Scientific and technical magazines and design research institutes often provided sanctuary and official employment to nonconformist, underground artists. Working for magazines, they embodied unusual, fantastic concepts, reflected on the essence of things, made conceptual designs for cover pages, and drew a new reality that had nothing to do with their real environment.

The usual Soviet aesthetic was subject to standardization and unification. That was the only design appropriate in a country with a planned economy, where it was almost impossible to introduce anything new. The space and defense industries were the only areas for which new production lines were built.

Space also became the leading motif in design and architecture starting from the 1960s. The so-called “cosmic style” was taking shape in Soviet architecture. The houses and public buildings being constructed started to resemble interplanetary ships, satellites, and flying saucers. On playgrounds, wondrous planets, rockets, and improvised scientific stations appeared, and the walls of kindergartens and schools were decorated with stars and galaxies. Images of cosmonauts began to appear in the design of metro stations. The space theme was also dominant in the planning and design of the folk festivals that filled the lives of Soviet people and heralded the latest achievements of science, such as the launching of new ships. The streets were filled with slogans and posters saying, “Communists pave the way to the stars,” and “Science and Communism are inseparable.”

In addition to science, many of the illustrations feature alien worlds. What relationship did the Soviet people have with this kind of science fiction?

There might have been secret research institutes that were engaged in detecting an alien mind, but we don’t know this for sure. Soviet people showed no great interest in alien worlds. My dad, a Soviet engineer, has been reading scientific and technical magazines for all his life. When I asked him if there were aliens, he answered that probably there were, but he had never wanted to meet them. Space exploration influenced mostly the creative class of Soviet people. Meetings with alien civilizations then became a popular topic in movies and animation.

<em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1955, illustration by N. Kolchitsky (left); <em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1969, illustrated by R. Avotin (right).
Technology for the Youth, 1955, illustration by N. Kolchitsky (left); Technology for the Youth, 1969, illustrated by R. Avotin (right). The Moscow Design Museum

Based on the books and stories, Soviet film studios shot films and created incredible, fantastic cartoons involving scientists and cosmonauts as consultants for the production process. Many films became real hits: It was impossible to get into the showings, and gathered around television sets were found not only several generations of a family at once, but also friends and neighbors.

How did the Soviet vision of alternate worlds evolve over time, and did it change after the first Moon landing?

In the 1950s, illustrations in magazines became realistic: The romanticization of space and anticipation of new discoveries were replaced by pictures of the universe obtained through the latest research. After the first artificial satellite was launched it became the main protagonist of the popular science magazines, constantly appearing on their covers. The illustrators of Science and Life and Knowledge Is Power increasingly depicted the newest versions of rockets and ships and transmitted surprisingly believable (even if, in fact, they were just fantasies of artists) details about flights to the Moon. It seemed as if real color photographs taken from space were being published in the columns.

However, images of humans in open space remained extremely rare at that time. Practically all of the artists portrayed researchers and space flight pioneers inside the cosmodromes where rockets and flying saucers were launched, or in labs where the Moon or planets were shown on giant screens. In these pictures, man was not the main protagonist but part of a futuristic landscape, the mere inhabitant of far-off planets on the roads of which droplet-shaped aerodynamic machines flew. The illustrations in Technology for the Youth were an exception.

After the Soviets and Americans made their first space flights, the designs of magazines were immediately filled with images of man in space. The cosmonauts were docking, gazing through portholes upon the expanses of space, and walking through cities and command centers on other planets. The scale of the dreams became completely different. If in the 1950s people were thinking about what technical tools would allow them to start mastering the expanses of the universe, only a decade later artists were already designing star cities, greenhouses, and massive stations where people could live for years. The “Khrushchev Thaw” was reflected not only in the content of the illustrations, but also in the palette. The style became vivid and futuristic, full of bright colors, and other planets seemed like friendly, welcoming worlds. A new avant-garde cycle began.

<em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1964, illustrated by A. Pobedinsky (left); <em>Technology for the Youth</em>, 1964, illustrated by A. Pobedinsky (right).
Technology for the Youth, 1964, illustrated by A. Pobedinsky (left); Technology for the Youth, 1964, illustrated by A. Pobedinsky (right). The Moscow Design Museum

In the 1970s, there was a shift in magazine design towards psychedelic graphics with characters and details, unusual perspectives in illustrations, and more complicated storytelling. However, most magazines with fascinating scientific and technical content were still being illustrated primarily with black-and-white drawings and diagrams—the cover and color inserts were the only colorful elements. Against this backdrop, Technology for the Youth was considered the most vibrant publication for many years.

Then idealistic images vanished and the illustrations grew gloomier. By the 1980s, not a trace of the dreams of the 1960s or the futurology of the 1970s remained. The designs of print publications became as realistic as possible, the colors less vivid, and the plots of stories centered on the everyday life of cosmonauts and scientists. By this time, the space race was already in decline. In 1972, an agreement between the Soviet Union and the United States on cooperation in the research and use of outer space for peaceful purposes had been signed. The pace of space exploration slowed down, and reports about work in orbit became ordinary news.

What is your favorite alternate world illustration in the book?

I really like the covers of Knowledge Is Power No. 12, 1969, and No. 11, 1971. They are abstract and convey the feeling that there are some parallel realities, other micro- and macro-worlds. Abstract covers depicting a very intuitive, associative artistic image of the unknown distinguish this magazine from other popular science publications having more realistic images on their covers.

<em>Knowledge Is Power</em>, 1969, artwork by S. Lukhin with photography by V. Brel (left); <em>Knowledge Is Power</em>, 1971, illustration by S. Lukhin (right).
Knowledge Is Power, 1969, artwork by S. Lukhin with photography by V. Brel (left); Knowledge Is Power, 1971, illustration by S. Lukhin (right). The Moscow Design Museum

Does the Soviet view of space still have resonance today?

The interest in it is returning, or it’s more correct to say that the interest has never faded. The topics popular in the 1960s and 1980s are now relevant again—ecology, alternative energy, reasonable consumption, overpopulation, and waste recycling. Back then it was regarded as futurology, but for us it’s already the reality.

Today, perhaps, a certain romanticism has vanished. Space is not seen as an end in itself anymore, now it is a means of survival: a place harmful production can be transferred to or where new sources of energy can be found.

There is an announcement at the Roskosmos website (the Russian state space corporation) inviting young people to join the cosmonaut program. I found it while preparing for this interview. However, there is no hype around this, and the announcement was reposted neither in the press, nor by social media. Now everyone realizes that the job of a cosmonaut or astronaut is the same as any other.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.


1/31/2021

Confucius on Good Government


Confucius on Good Government, the 6 Steps to a Harmonious Society, and Self-Discipline as the Key to Democracy

“Things have roots and branches… If the root be in confusion, nothing will be well governed.”

Confucius on Good Government, the 6 Steps to a Harmonious Society, and Self-Discipline as the Key to Democracy

Two and a half millennia before Leonard Cohen wrote in his timeless and tender ode to democracy that “the heart has got to open in a fundamental way,” the ancient Chinese philosopher and statesman Confucius (551–479 BCE) recognized the indelible link between personal and political morality, recognized that interpersonal kindness is the foundation of social justice, recognized that democracy — a form of government only just invented on the other side of the globe in ancient Greece, not to take root in his own culture for epochs — begins in the heart.

Confucius. 1909 engraving, artist unknown. (Available as a print.)

Centuries before the advent of Christianity and its central tenet of the golden rule, the Chinese sage pioneered the concept of compassion as a moral guiding principle — an ancient concept subtly yet profoundly different from empathy, which only entered the modern lexicon at the dawn of the twentieth century as a term for projecting oneself into a work of art. On his existential reading list of essential books for every stage of life, Tolstoy listed Confucius among the most mature reading. His teachings went on to influence millennia of poets, political leaders, and ordinary people seeking to live nobler, kinder, more empowered lives.

Among them was the poet Ezra Pound (October 30, 1885–November 1, 1972) — a man of immense talent and immense blind spots, of sympathetic idealisms and troubling sympathies — who set out to translate and compile the most enduring teachings of the great Chinese sage. His 1927 more-than-translation earned Pound the $2,000 poetry prize of The Dial — the pioneering Transcendentalist magazine Margaret Fuller and Ralph Waldo Emerson had launched nearly a century earlier at the peak of their intense and complicated relationship, which shaped the history of modern thought. Pound used the funds to launch his own poetic-political magazine. The following year, his translation was published in book form as Confucius: The Unwobbling Pivot / The Great Digest / The Analects (public library).

In his prefatory note, Pound observed that China was tranquil and harmonious for as long as its rulers followed the teachings of Confucius, but dynasties collapsed into chaos and social catastrophe as soon as these principles were neglected. In a sentiment that applies as much to those ancient sociopolitical collapses as to the perils of the present, he writes:

The proponents of a world order will neglect at their peril the study of the only process that has repeatedly proved its efficiency as a social coordinate.

The Sage and the Banditti. 1887 woodcut, artist unknown. (Available as a print.)

That process, as Confucius conceived it, was one of treating public good as a matter of personal goodness, rooted in a purity of heart and a discipline of mind. Noting that “things have roots and branches” and that “if the root be in confusion, nothing will be well governed,” the ancient Chinese sage outlines the six steps to a harmonious society:

The [ancients], wanting to clarify and diffuse throughout the empire that light which comes from looking straight into the heart and then acting, first set up good government in their own states; wanting good government in their own states, they first established order in their own families; wanting order in the home, they first disciplined themselves; desiring self-discipline, they rectified their own hearts; and wanting to rectify their hearts, they sought precise verbal definitions of their inarticulate thoughts. Wishing to attain precise verbal definitions, they set to extend their knowledge to the utmost. This completion of knowledge is rooted in sorting things into organic categories.

Confucius. Colorized 1900 photogravure, artist unknown. (Available as a print.)

This essential classification is the work of clarity and comprehension — we classify to understand and to order our priorities. Once this work is complete, Confucius counsels, the process is folded over and the six steps are retraced back to the original goal of good government:

When things had been classified in organic categories, knowledge moved toward fulfillment; given the extreme knowable points, the inarticulate thoughts were defined with precision… Having attained this precise verbal definition, they then stabilized their hearts, they disciplined themselves; having attained self-discipline, they set their own houses in order; having order in their own homes, they brought good government to their own states; and when their states were well governed, the empire was brought into equilibrium.

Complement with mathematician Lilian Lieber on how Euclid illuminates the roots of democracy and social justice and the great humanistic philosopher and psychologist Erich Fromm on what self-love really means and how it anchors a sane society, then revisit Ursula K. Le Guin’s superb more-than-translation of Tao Te Ching and its ancient wisdom on the wellspring of personal and political power.


Brain Pickings

Sumo

1/30/2021

Mandelbrot set and so much more

A Single Equation that Rules the World

The equation connects neuron firing, fluid convection, the Mandelbrot set and so much more and will definitely change your view of this world.


Image for post
A Single Equation that Rules the World. Source: .

What if I say that the Mandelbrot set, a population of squirrels, a dripping faucet, the firing of neurons in our brain and the thermal convection is connected by one simple equation? Maybe you’ll laugh at me. But math is stranger than fiction.

Let’s dive deep into this.

Suppose you want to model a population of squirrels. This year, we have X number of squirrels. So, what might be the population next year? A simple model can be, just multiply the current population with a number. Let it be r. so, the growth rate is r. So, next year, the number of squirrels will be rX.

If r=2, it will mean that the population will double every year. But there is a problem. It implies that the population of squirrels will grow exponentially, forever. That doesn’t really happen. So, we bound it by some constrains. Let’s add the term (1-X) to the equation to represent the constraints of the environment.

So, it becomes rX(1-X). Here we are imagining X is a percentage of the theoretical maximum. X goes from 0 to 1 and as it approaches 1, (1-X) approaches 0.

Let’s say the population of squirrels next year will be Xₙ₊₁ and the population of squirrels this year is Xₙ. So, we get an equation:

Xₙ₊₁ = rXₙ(1-Xₙ)

This is the logistic map equation. If you graph Xₙ₊₁ versus Xₙ, you get an inverted parabola.


Image for post
Graph of Xₜ₊₁ vs Xₜ and a graph of Xₜ₊₂ vs Xₜ₊₁ and Xₜ. Source: .

In this graph, t has been used instead of n. But it’s the same thing.

It’s the simplest possible equation with a negative feedback loop. What’s that? Let me explain. The bigger the population gets over Xₙ (this year) the smaller it will be on Xₙ₊₁ (the following year).

Still not clear? Alright, let’s understand this with examples.

Let r be 3.4, and the starting population Xₙ be 0.3 (30% of the maximum population). Upon calculating, we get 0.816. Okay, so the population increased from 0.3 to 0.816 in the first year. That’s a huge increment. But then if we take 0.816 as the population of this year (Xₙ), next year the population will be 0.510. Again, the year after that it will be 0.849.

But wait, there’s a catch here. After some years, the population keeps oscillating between 0.451 and 0.842 approximately. It doesn’t really change beyond that.

But wait, there’s even more. A population remains almost constant when the growth rate is 2 or near to 2. Because two children just replace their parents, so, after a certain time, the population becomes almost constant. Let’s try this out.

Suppose Xₙ is 0.35 (35% of the maximum population) and r is 2.34. So, Xₙ₊₁ will be 0.532. The year after that it will be 0.582, followed by 0.569 the year after that. After a year, the population will stabilize on 0.57. It will not increase or decrease much and will almost be fixed at 0.57, i.e, 57% of the maximum possible population. The population reaches an equilibrium.

Now, even if we change the initial population, it will still reach the equilibrium sooner or later. The equilibrium number only depends on the value of r. If r is lower, then the equilibrium population gets lower and if it is lesser than 1, then the population gets to 0 sooner or later.

Now, let’s make another graph with r (growth rate) on x axis and the equilibrium population on y axis. At first, when r is lesser than 1, the equilibrium population remains 0. But upon r crossing 1, the equilibrium population keeps increasing.


Image for post
Single value equilibrium population.

But something interesting happens when r passes 3 and maybe you can guess it too. Remember when we kept r=3.4. The equilibrium population kept oscillating between 0.84 and 0.51. After that, if never settles down to a constant value and it oscillates back and forth between two values instead. One year the population is higher and the next year it is lower and then it is higher again in the following year.

As time passes, the equilibrium population splits into 4 values. The population repeats after a 4-year cycle.


Image for post
The value of equilibrium population keeps oscillating between two values.

Since the length of the cycle has doubled, it is called period-doubling bifurcations. as r increases, it leads to cycles of 8, 16, 32 and when r reaches about 3.57, it’s complete chaos. Then the population never settles down at all.


Image for post
Chaos in the value of equilibrium population.

The population just becomes random. It is so random that this was one of the primary methods of generating random numbers in computers. This way, a deterministic machine gave an unpredictable answer. Although there is no repeating, if you know the initial values, you can calculate the given values. So, it’s actually pseudo-random.

Wait, look at the graph at around r= 3.83 approximately. There is a small portion where the order returned. The population repeated after 3 years. The cycle was of 3 years. As r grows more and more, the cycle splits into 6, 12, 24 and then chaos again.


Logistic Bifurcation map
Logistic Bifurcation map. Source: .

You might be thinking, it looks like a fractal. Well, it is. The large scale features are repeated on a smaller scale.

Probably the most famous fractal is the Mandelbrot set.


Image for post
Mandelbrot Set. Source: .

Well, there’s a surprise for you. The bifurcation diagram is actually a part of the Mandelbrot set.


Logistic Map Bifurcations Underneath Mandelbrot Set
Logistic Map Bifurcations Underneath Mandelbrot Set. Source: .

Cool, right?

What the heck is a Mandelbrot set?

It is based on the simple equation, Zₙ₊₁ = Zₙ² + C. So, pick a number C, any number in the complex plane, then start calculating Zₙ₊₁ starting from Zₙ = 0. Now, iterate this equation again and again and again and again and… You get my point.

Now, if the number blows up to infinity, then that number (what we assumed as C) is not a part of the Mandelbrot set. But, if that number remains finite after unlimited iterations, it is part of the Mandelbrot set.

For example, if C=3, after the first iteration, Zₙ₊₁=3. After the second iteration, Zₙ₊₁=12. After the third iteration, Zₙ₊₁=147. After unlimited iterations, Zₙ₊₁ will be infinity. So, 3 will not be a part of the Mandelbrot set.

Again, if C=-1, after the first iteration, Zₙ₊₁=-1. After the second iteration, Zₙ₊₁=0. After the third iteration, Zₙ₊₁=-1. After the fourth iteration Zₙ₊₁=0 again. The value of Zₙ₊₁ oscillates between -1, and 0. So, -1 is a part of the Mandelbrot set.

The picture of the Mandelbrot set just shows the boundary between the numbers that cause the iterated equation to blow up and those that cause it to blow up. What the Mandelbrot set doesn’t show is how these equations remain finite. So, we iterated the equation thousands of times and plotted on the z axis the iteration actually takes. So, the side view of the Mandelbrot set is actually the bifurcation diagram.

All of the numbers in the main cardioid end up stabilizing on a single constant and the numbers in the main bulb oscillate between two values. In the smaller bulb, they oscillate between four values and so on. The chaotic part of the bifurcation diagram happens on the needle of the Mandelbrot set. Now, look at the medallion in the middle of the needle part. That part is when the bifurcation plot stabilizes for a small window.

How beautiful and mind-boggling this is!

Now, I claimed that this equation determines the population of a species. Is this true? Well, yes. Especially in laboratory conditions. Not only this, the equation applies to a huge variety of different areas of science and often those areas of science are unrelated to each other.

Albert J. Libchaber’s work on fluid dynamics first confirmed this equation. His experiment included a small rectangular box with mercury inside. Then he used a small temperature gradient to induce convection, just two counter-rotating cylinders inside his box. He published his findings in a named ‘Period doubling cascade in mercury, a quantitative measurement’. The findings were astonishing.

An article of states,

“Libchaber used a simple pen plotter to record the temperature, as measured by a probe embedded in the top surface. In the equilibrium motion after the first bifurcation, the temperature at any one point remains steady, more or less, and the pen records a straight line. With more heating, more instability sets in. A kink develops in each roll, and the kink moves steadily back and forth. This wobble shows up as a changing temperature, up and down between two values. The pen now draws a wavy line across the paper.”

Libchaber measured the temperature of the fluid inside with a probe on the top of the box. He saw a periodic spike in the temperature. It’s similar to when the logistic equation converges to a single value. But then, as the temperature increases, a wobble can be seen on those rolling cylinders at half the original frequency. The spikes in temperature also went back and forth between two different heights. He kept increasing the temperature and he saw period-doubling again and again.


Image for post
Results of Libchaber’s test. Source: .

Not only this, period-doubling could be seen in many other experiments, like the response of our and Salamander’s eyes to flickering lights. Also, a lot of researchers have found our period doubling in a dripping faucet. For example, at first, you see only one drop at a time. Then two drops at a time. Then four… You achieve chaotic behaviour from a dripping faucet just by adjusting the knob.

Now if the bifurcation diagram already looks spooky to you, hold on, we got more. Physicist Mitchen Feigenbaum divided the width of each bifurcations section by the next one. That ratio closed into a number. It’s 4.669. That’s like, 4.6Nice.

Jokes apart, the number 4.669 is now called the Feigenbaum constant. The bifurcations come faster to the right but the ratio is always approaching to this fixed value of 4.669.

Now, 4.669 is thought to be a fundamental constant because it doesn’t relate to any other existing physical constant in the universe. But wait, not only the equation I wrote at the beginning of this article obey this. Any equation that has a single hump (for example, Xₙ₊₁ = sinx), if you iterate it again and again, you will be bifurcations. Even the ratio of when these bifurcations occur will be the same, 4.669.

The bifurcation diagram and the Feigenbaum constant is thought to be universal. Because it appears in so many places in mathematics and physics. This universality is truly amazing.

So, yeah. That’s the equation that rules the universe. Well, let me correct myself a bit. It’s not just an equation, it’s the bifurcation diagram and the Feigenbaum constant. So, that’s an equation that has a single bump behaves the same way.

I hope more researches are made in this field and the Feigenbaum constant is checked in more phenomenons in nature. Only that way we will be able to unravel its true power.

This article is heavily inspired by an article on , a video by , and Libchaber’s paper, named ‘’.


Samrat Dutta

Written by

Developer, designer, writer, data analyst, AI specialist. https://www.patreon.com/SamratDuttaOfficial https://www.instagram.com/samratduttaofficial

Cryorus

Great exposition, this is also why the #Asynsis principle is an elegant new green, design law of nature and culture.

Here's my QED, first published in AD Magazine in 1994, and as shared on TED conferences, plus how we can apply it via #MetaLoop…...

5

Well done. thanks for the examples. Only one criticism: it appears that your essay had been nidely edited until this paragraph when the wording began to deteriorate: "Now if the bifurcation diagram already looks spooky to you, hold on, we got more…...

5

3

I think this article misses some really important aspects, because although the equation shows the process from determinism to chaos it doesn't rule the world. Rule is the operative word.

This is because it's not the only thing going. The presence of…...


1/28/2021

ABC de la corruption systémique


Comment et pourquoi nos gouvernements nous mentent : ABC de la corruption systémique

Le saviez-vous ? Les mesures brutales qui nous sont imposées par nos gouvernements ne sont ni utiles ni nécessaires. En prétendant l’inverse, ils continuent à abuser de notre crédulité et de notre bonne foi, tout en mettant à genoux nos sociétés et en détruisant la vie de tant de nos concitoyens.

Vous trouvez cette introduction choquante ? Alors ouvrez votre esprit et accrochez votre ceinture… Voici un résumé glané sur le net présentant fort bien ce dont il s’agit :

 

Voyez-vous cet homme dont le portait figure en tête d'article? Il s’appelle John Ioannidis. C’est le plus grand épidémiologiste du monde. Oui, du monde. Il est professeur à Stanford, avec un H-Index de 200+, et ses travaux sur la méthode scientifique sont parmi les plus cités en recherche clinique.

Eh bien, voici ce qu’il pense du confinement : « plus on avance, plus on constate que les bénéfices supposés du confinement sont des artefacts dus à la modélisation, ils ne sont pas vrais » ; « les confinements sont une mesure extrême, nous savons qu’ils produisent des dégâts incommensurables sur les gens, leurs vies, leur santé, leur santé mentale... ».

Le Pr Ioannidis vient de publier avec son équipe une étude où il a comparé les politiques sanitaires de différents pays. Conclusion : il n’y a aucune différence de performance entre les pays qui ont confiné et les autres. L’alternative confinement / laissez-faire est une alternative fausse : nous n’avons pas à choisir entre « une mesure difficile mais efficace » et « sacrifier les gens à l’économie », car les confinements ne marchent pas, un point c’est tout. Il serait donc temps d’isoler les malades, exiger des tests pour tous les voyageurs et de protéger correctement les personnes à risque, ce qu’on fait toujours peu ou pas après un an.

 

Cette étude rejoint la pile de toutes les précédentes concluant à l’inutilité de ces mesures insensées et brutales.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral, pourtant informé que sa décision signera l’arrêt de mort de centaines de milliers de commerces, restaurants et entreprises dans le pays ? Eh bien il confine et ferme les commerces et les restaurants !

On reconnaît enfin (même l’OMS !) que les tests PCR utilisés à tour de bras sont faussés et ne devraient jamais être utilisés autrement que comme outil diagnostic dans le cadre d’une consultation médicale.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral ? il décide de tester à tours de bras, investissant 1 milliards de francs (pas perdus pour tout le monde donc) dans cette décision irresponsable et inutile !

L’imposition du masque a des effets négatifs majeurs pour la santé (en particulier des enfants et des jeunes) sans avoir montré d’utilité en population générale (ce que rappelle même l’OMS). Dans le même temps, une étude chinoise vient de montrer que les personnes Covid+ asymptomatiques ne sont pas contagieuses et la Suède connaît une décrue réjouissante des « cas » sans avoir jamais confiné, fermé les commerces ou masqué.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral ? il continue d’imposer le port du msasque !

L’ivermectine montre une efficacité précoce, curative et prophylactique remarquable, supérieure même à l’hydroxychloroquine pourtant déjà efficace. Ce médicament est extrêmement sûr, facile d’usage et ne coûte à peu près rien.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral ? Il continue de mettre des bâtons dans les roues au traitement des malades du Covid et de tout miser sur le « vaccin génique » uniquement !

Les expérimentations médicamenteuses ou vaccinales sur la population sont contraires à l’éthique et rigoureusement interdites par le droit de la santé -notamment international.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral ? Il avance à marche forcée dans la généralisation d’une expérimentation génique à risque, à large échelle !

Les données avancées par les firmes vaccinales sont incomplètes, bidouillées ou même fausses.

Or que fait le Conseil fédéral ? Il s’approprie le discours publicitaire de Big Pharma sans changer une virgule !

 

Il est difficile en effet de faire cas d’autant d’absurdités. On peut certes accorder le bénéfice du doute à nos autorités et mettre ce cortège de décisions absurdes et destructrices sur le compte de la maladresse ou de la stupidité. Plus le temps passe, plus on est obligé de constater que l'explication est un peu courte…

A vrai dire, le seul éclairage (hélas) qui mette en lumière la cohérence délétère de ce cortège d’absurdités est celui que nous développons ici depuis de longs mois, à savoir les effets tragiques de la corruption systémique prévalant dans le domaine des politiques de santé.

 

Cette situation est tellement hénaurme que je comprends fort bien que tant de personnes  préfèrent s’abstenir d’y réfléchir en se contentant du discours mensonger des autorités et des médias. Un entrepreneur genevois actif dans le domaine de l’immobilier (par ailleurs intelligemment critique quant à l’impact économique des mesures imposées) le résuma récemment fort bien ainsi sur un réseau social : « Ne connaissant rien aux virus ni aux vaccins, écrivait-il, je m’en remets aux autorités et aux médecins, en qui j’ai confiance ».

Position qui serait pleine de bon sens et de sagesse si les autorités et le monde médical en question étaient en effet intègres et dignes de confiance. Ce que ce monsieur ignore (comme la quasi-totalité des gens), c’est que cela fait longtemps que ça n’est plus le cas : la santé est l’un des domaines d’activités les plus corrompus et crapuleux qui soient.

 

Le fossé est tel entre la réalité des choses et l’image naïve qu’en a la population, intensivement désinformée, que cela produit en retour un violent clivage dans la société.

Les Suisses en particulier préfèrent encore se bercer de la douce illusion que les choses sont différentes chez nous, que nos ministres sont des hommes et des femmes honnêtes qui ne trahiraient jamais la confiance de la population. Qui prennent le tram comme tout le monde et avec qui on pourrait manger la fondue en toute simplicité. Et qui ont sincèrement le bien commun à l’esprit.

Il est plus que jamais urgent d’ouvrir les yeux : la réalité telle qu’elle se déroule sous nos yeux est que nos autorités conduisent nos pays au désastre et à la ruine. Nos ministres ne sont pas des braves types, ce sont les fossoyeurs de notre démocratie, trahissant la population au service d’intérêts crapuleux.

Cet énoncé est certes d’une grande violence. Non en lui-même, mais parce qu’il soulève le voile sur une réalité qui est bel et bien violente à ce point.

Je mesure que je vais continuer à ne pas forcément me faire des amis en l’énonçant une fois de plus. L’écart est désormais si grand entre l’illusion que préservent à tout prix tant de nos concitoyens et l’étendue de la forfaiture dont se rendent coupables nos autorités, politiques et sanitaires qu’il est certes plus facile de considérer d’emblée comme des « inepties » ou de l’ « émotionalité » ce qui relève à l’inverse d’une analyse implacable de la situation…

 

Ce qu’une connaissance réelle du sujet montre, c’est que :

1/ Nos « politiques de santé » sont configurées selon le profit que les maladies permettent de réaliser. L’essentiel de la morbidité et de la mortalité en Occident est dû à un cortège de maladie chroniques qui seraient à 80% évitables ou réversibles si on s’occupait de la santé de la population !

2/ Les gouvernements, les autorités de santé, les hôpitaux, les sociétés médicales et l’enseignement sont infiltrées à tous les étages par l’industrie pharmaco-vaccinale, qui les tient docilement sous son influence.

3/ La corruption est « systémique », c’est-à-dire qu’elle ne dépend pas de la corruption de tel ou tel responsable ou de telle ou telle institution. Elle utilise par ailleurs de nombreux moyens légaux disponibles, en plus des moyens illégaux.

4/ La recherche est massivement truquée et falsifiée, en particulier dans les principales revues médicales, qui publient en fermant les yeux des études-bidon commandités ou produites par l’industrie.

5/ Les médecins croient de bonne foi prescrire des traitements utiles et efficaces alors que ce n’est souvent pas le cas. Les conséquences de la « mauvaise médecine » qui en découle est désormais la troisième cause de mortalité en Occident.

6/ Cet état de fait a été identifié par des autorités comme la Commission européenne ou le rapporteur des Nations-Unies, le Sénat français, les centres d’éthique des meilleures universités, les rédacteurs des principales revues médicales elles-mêmes, mais : dans une situation comme celle que nous vivons,  tout le monde fait semblant que cela n’existe pas et que l’affirmer reviendrait à tenir des théories complotistes !

7/ Le résultats des courses : des centaines de milliers de morts évitables, des économies en ruine, des populations terrifiées et un agenda désormais mondial pour un Grand Reset qu’aucune population n’a choisi.

 

Je viens de tourner à la demande de Reinfocovid une petite série de trois vidéos sur ces phénomènes que je ne cesse d’essayer de rappeler et qui pèsent de tout leur poids sur le réel que nous subissons depuis une année.

Je livre ici le fruit de 20 années de recherche sur ces douloureuses questions, avec une petite somme de références pour les citoyennes et citoyens désireux d’en avoir le cœur net.

Car tout ce que j’avance est bien sûr documenté et sourcé.

L’omerta régnant au sujet de ce que je vais vous présenter est si absolu (dans les médias, les parlements et les gouvernements comme dans les sociétés médicales et les universités-) que ce simple élément confirmerait si besoin était l’étendue de l’indignité.

 

Imaginez par exemple notre pays se trouvant à organiser un grand événement sportif (comme les Jeux Olympiques ou la Coupe du monde de football) dans un contexte où l’industrie des paris sportifs  (comme cela est arrivé sous certaines latitudes) corrompait et truquait systématiquement le résultat des compétitions.

Les meilleures revues auraient signalé le problème de longue date, les centres d’éthique des universités l’auraient analysé et fait connaître de long en large, tout ce que la société civile compte d’ONG l’aurait dénoncé ainsi que nombre de sportifs eux-mêmes, sans oublier Interpol , avec une montagne de jugement pénaux démontrant l’inconduite criminelle de cette industrie et la corruption qu’elle met systémiquement en œuvre.

Imaginez encore malgré cela le Conseil fédéral in corpore, avec le Parlement et la presse unanime derrière lui, inaugurant le grand événement en louant l’esprit sportif, le fair-play et la probité de ces magnifiques compétitions. En encourageant la population à jouer le plus possible aux paris sportifs, bien sûr irréprochablement honnêtes.

Avec des fédérations sportives corrompues et complices, dont aucun membre n’oserait prendre la parole pour dénoncer les turpitudes en cours de peur des conséquences. Avec une presse unanime pour stigmatiser avec brutalité les quelques critiques et les lanceurs d’alerte, qu’elles désigneraient à l’opprobre public comme étant des « complotisss » malgré la montagne de preuves à disposition (sur lesquelles elles s’interdiraient bien sûr la moindre investigation.)

Plutôt moche, non ?! Et pourtant, dans ce scénario, les autorités ne joueraient qu’avec notre innocence, notre bonne foi et notre porte-monnaie.

Dans la crise du Covid, elles jouent avec nos vies, notre santé, nos moyens de subsistance…

 



Au sujet des maladies chroniques évitables :

https://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disea...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974..."


à 0:45 : instances décisionnaires infiltrées par d'anciens de l'industrie pharmaceutique http://thierrysouccar.blogspot.com/20...

https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/politique...

https://www.lepoint.fr/editos-du-poin...

à 5:42 : la majorité de ce qui est publié est faux

https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicin...

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/09/09/...

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/01/31/...

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journa...

https://www.nature.com/news/biotech-g...

https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/371/b...

à 1:40 : guerre du Vietnam et en Irak

https://www.france24.com/fr/20150320-...

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inciden...

à 3:31: Peter Gotzsche https://www.routledge.com/Deadly-Medi...

à 5:00 : amendes de Pfizer de 4 milliards de dollars

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirs...

https://inside.uncc.edu/news-features...

https://www.france24.com/fr/20090903-...

https://www.corvelva.it/fr/approfondi...

https://francais.medscape.com/voirart...

à 6:45 : Tamiflu

https://www.bmj.com/tamiflu

rapport sénat pour la vaccination H1N1 de 2009 : https://www.senat.fr/rap/r09-685-1/r0...

 

 

 

 

Anthropo-logiques